“..The High Hat limousine was of course designed for the gentleman of high social standing who did not wish to remove his hat when climbing aboard,…”
"A jeep is a jeep"
"A jeep is a jeep"
A mustang is a mustang
With two doors or four. My favorite will always be the two door. But if they add two doors to the s650, it's a four door mustang.
Uh-oh, the four door has a larger wheelbase... It's not a true jeep then
“The origins of Jeep have been called "obscure," but a good deal of that has been clarified through diligent research. The primary legend has the name coming from a slurring of "GP," but it didn't mean "General Purpose." The "G" signified a Ford government contract vehicle and "P" indicating the 80-inch wheelbase. Even though the Ford GP was the first jeep to reach GIs in large numbers in 1941, the General Purpose name wasn't Army nomenclature in WWII and only seen on obscure documents.”
https://www.motortrend.com/features/1604-trail-head-how-the-jeep-got-its-name/
Interesting how it got the name though. 
Theres a lot more people who either don’t care what it’s called or want it called something else (compared to those who want it to be a Mustang) and that’s why it would be cool and a perfect opportunity to reintroduce a different Icon. There could be so many more possibilities that would be widely accepted from engine choices or variants.
To me it (the 4 door coupe render) says charger. But otherwise i agree but then disagree regarding the name. They can give the ‘gt’ treatment to any vehicle but to mustangify it would need to lose weight, drop some doors, and gain that sporty vibe.
I think the main reason they would call it a mustang is because they can share parts. Same interior, infotainment, front end, some body panels, undercarriage parts etc to reduce costs. I think it'd get expensive to build something from the ground up. This will reduce costs on both the 2 door and 4 door.Theres a lot more people who either don’t care what it’s called or want it called something else (compared to those who want it to be a Mustang) and that’s why it would be cool and a perfect opportunity to reintroduce a different Icon. There could be so many more possibilities that would be widely accepted from engine choices or variants.
I want Ford to make a performance sedan too because I always thought they could do better than what Chevy offered. G8/SS were cool but they got no love from GM
You can still do it with something else realistically. I don’t think the front end, rear end, and all the components will be all shared from what people said the side view was very Panamera like and the door opening was like the Mach Es, which is kinda the only description we got to work off of.
I don't think anyone knows anything yet. But if they share all these parts and looks just like an s650 and called it something else, I'd feel like it'd be a slap in the face to mustang owners, way moreso than calling it a mustang.
There was a couple people who attended the meeting that shared what they saw at the meeting on Reddit, even the new Bronco variant. Only thing he said was it was a render but it was low slung, Panamera like with no door handles.
If you can find the post, can you share it? I'd be interested in reading it
I was having so many injector issues with my 550i that I almost traded it in for a Chevy SS. The only reason I didn't was the seats were bad for my wife. As this was our cross country driving car, we needed seats that you could sit in easily for 12-14 hours at a stretch. The Chevy wasn't it.Theres a lot more people who either don’t care what it’s called or want it called something else (compared to those who want it to be a Mustang) and that’s why it would be cool and a perfect opportunity to reintroduce a different Icon. There could be so many more possibilities that would be widely accepted from engine choices or variants.
I want Ford to make a performance sedan too because I always thought they could do better than what Chevy offered. G8/SS were cool but they got no love from GM
