smurfslayer
Well-Known Member
Really, it’s enough nut hugging.Don't big yourself up.My point was a general one about car owners. You don't wear your clearance badge on here because nobody cares on a car forum!
Don't agree about the latter - law enforcement should be allowed to access the data with court authority.
It’s too easy for the court order/warrant authority to be abused and once they’re granted access to any of the retained information, they get ALL of the available information and are under no obligation to erase or dispose of it.Yes
key word here "court authority"
Better thread title may have been "Information sharing...Love/Hate"
There's really two topics in one here. Thank You for the article though Alan. I am against data sharing with any outside entity. I'm surely not getting any sort of safe driver discount when the "loud car" rolls down the driveway.
You’re wasting your keystrokesBeing concerned about our freedom and vigilant to notice when it’s threatened is why we still have it. If only citizens around the world had the same backbone to speak out and stand up against threats to freedom no matter how big or insignificant those threats appear.
If you were murdered, someone could just rewrite your programmingPlease don't tell me you think this is a bad thing?
How the IoT Is Solving Murders and Reshaping Discovery
As you say strong privacy laws (as in Europe) are important so that only law enforcement authorities get access when required and approved by a court. This prevents companies using the data for commercial benefit.
I know for sure if I was murdered I would want any car data used, if appropriate, to find the murderer.
More Mustang driving. Less bench racing.
Sponsored