Bridgie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 25, 2015
- Threads
- 2
- Messages
- 47
- Reaction score
- 15
- Location
- Raleigh, North Carolina
- Vehicle(s)
- 2015 GT fastback. PP, 50th trim, Black
Sponsored
unfortunately it's the ONLY angle that looks good. But in some twisted logic that's a good thing I guess because well, that's the view the entire world is going to experience, right?I think the rear of the car and the taillights in particular look fantastic from this angle:
It will be American Muscle with an aftermarket fix.They are in fact disproportionately small for the rear end. They need to come down further to be in line with the lowest portion of the trunk and thereby making a straight line from taillight-trunk-taillight. That would've fixed the whole thing.
![]()
Scratch magnet, yes. As soon you wash it its scratched.They're a fine size, given the elimination of the rear scratch magnet. They just aren't imitative of the 550.
Absotootly. I think that looks goodI am not the only one who thinks the real lights are too small. Actually I read numerous comments of people that think the same.
Today I saw a video on YouTube of a sketch guy and I was curious about what he would improve out of the new S650.
And he made the car exactly as what I wanted. Making the rear lights bigger is the solution.
![]()
Other than the interior, it seems the rear tail lights is dividing opinions.
my initial reaction was yuck, they look conservative, politically correct and horrible...
the more I look at it's growing on me. I still haven't worked out whether I'm warming to it because it's simply new and different
They have the texture of piano keys Smooth no texture.
That's a lot of real estate to replace in a rear end collision. One rear end facia, two plastic panels, mufflers and tailpipes, and a trunk lid, not counting all of the infrastructure underneath.