Germansheperd
Well-Known Member
That is correct but one pass was 112. Factor DA variables, was a car idling in the staging lanes, ambient temp 111 traps are possible.Well, it's not only trapping 111 and it's a convertible.
Sponsored
That is correct but one pass was 112. Factor DA variables, was a car idling in the staging lanes, ambient temp 111 traps are possible.Well, it's not only trapping 111 and it's a convertible.
and factor them the other way around and the car is going 116That is correct but one pass was 112. Factor DA variables, was a car idling in the staging lanes, ambient temp 111 traps are possible.
It *CANand factor them the other way around and the car is going 116
That matches up with what those can run....It *CAN
FYI here is my 455hp 2024 Camaro off the showroom floor that trapped 117 on the crappy stock Goodyear 245’s In 1600 DA. As with anything YMMV.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
That's still not bad. I know many of us want the mustang GT to weigh 3,500 lbs, Farley talked about how he wants to make the mustang lighter as well, but without exotic materials like carbon fiber, there's only so much you could do. I'd be curious to see how much weight is saved ditching the rear seats, that could be one path forward, it's not like mustang owners really use rear seats anyway.Agreed, I doubt it's calibrated for passenger cars. Ford lists these weights for the automatic-transmission (10R80) variants of the S650 Mustangs:
Model Weight Ecoboost Fastback 3588 lbs. Ecoboost Convertible 3741 lbs. GT Fastback 3832 lbs. GT Convertible 4012 lbs. Dark Horse Fastback 3993 lbs.