• Welcome to Mustang7G!

    If you're joining us from Mustang6G, then you may already have an account here!

    As long as you were registered on Mustang6G as of March 10, 2021 or earlier, then you can simply login here with the same username and password!

Whipple vs Roush - Which supercharger is better?

kagemusha2662

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
312
Reaction score
353
Location
Idk
Vehicle(s)
'24 Mustang Dark Horse / '13 Camaro ZL1 / '25 Civic Hybrid
despite how similar 6G and 7G are, i dont think its wise to just assume. think of it this way, 6G is one pond and 7G is another. sure, putting 6G stuff in the 7G pond could be fine, but it could also cause trouble. i think we should wait until people have done their tests on 7G. beteer safe than sorry
Fair enough, I think for the s650 and s550, for me personally, I'm treating them as essentially the same car as far as most parts. I also don't think it would cause any engine trouble per say, just gotta weight the cost benefits
Sponsored

 
OP
OP
broncoboy22

broncoboy22

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
219
Reaction score
205
Location
Laker Land
Vehicle(s)
ā€˜22 Bronco Badlands, ā€˜02 F-150
this vid was great but I still wanna see a stock for stock or mod for mod comparison on the CARB versions of both. Once tuning is unlocked weā€™ll get the TT and pro charger comparisons
 

robvas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2024
Threads
7
Messages
1,143
Reaction score
911
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
2011 Mustang
despite how similar 6G and 7G are, i dont think its wise to just assume. think of it this way, 6G is one pond and 7G is another. sure, putting 6G stuff in the 7G pond could be fine, but it could also cause trouble. i think we should wait until people have done their tests on 7G. beteer safe than sorry
Going to do the same on either car they are basically the same car anyway
 

Katastrophe

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2014
Threads
5
Messages
476
Reaction score
202
Location
MB, Canada
Vehicle(s)
14' Honda Civic EX; 14' Honda VFR800 DLX
OP
OP
broncoboy22

broncoboy22

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
219
Reaction score
205
Location
Laker Land
Vehicle(s)
ā€˜22 Bronco Badlands, ā€˜02 F-150


9secondko

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Jul 4, 2014
Threads
3
Messages
3,156
Reaction score
911
Location
Irvine, ca
Vehicle(s)
2003 cobra
Same story, different day.
Whipper Is the king of supercharging.

thatā€™s a huge power difference, far beyond any margin of error for exhaust mods.

whipple has, over the years, gotten as efficient as possible for roots type/twin screw supercharging. Theyā€™ve made them for everyone and in spite of major competition over the decades, theyā€™ve always risen to the top.

reliability is a big plus with whipper also. Itā€™s no doubt the reason Ford trusts them so much as to offer a dealer special with whipper install with warranty intact.

Roush is great, but if you just want the most power, the whips is the one.
 
OP
OP
broncoboy22

broncoboy22

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
219
Reaction score
205
Location
Laker Land
Vehicle(s)
ā€˜22 Bronco Badlands, ā€˜02 F-150
Same story, different day.
Whipper Is the king of supercharging.

thatā€™s a huge power difference, far beyond any margin of error for exhaust mods.

whipple has, over the years, gotten as efficient as possible for roots type/twin screw supercharging. Theyā€™ve made them for everyone and in spite of major competition over the decades, theyā€™ve always risen to the top.

reliability is a big plus with whipper also. Itā€™s no doubt the reason Ford trusts them so much as to offer a dealer special with whipper install with warranty intact.

Roush is great, but if you just want the most power, the whips is the one.
Whipple does make the most power, but in their equivalent trims with warranties they are even

this comparison was the CARB Roush vs the non-CARB whipple with exhaust mods. So not apples to apples

The higher power whipple ones do not come with the warranty

To me itā€™s a stretch to call whipple king. Itā€™s more of what suits your needs. If you have no budget or warranty concerns AND you want the most power, then yup, whipple wins. But then again Twin Turbo is even better if that is the case (once the tuning is unlocked)

but if you want a warranty, CARB, and whine and donā€™t care about every single pony then Roush is the choice IMO

the video creator noted the GTD uses a TVS blower over the twin screw. So there are diff applications for each type. Buyer preference is all that matters essentially
 

Q6543

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2022
Threads
21
Messages
1,534
Reaction score
1,891
Location
Detroit
Vehicle(s)
1993 fox
Iā€™ve still year to see 1 single roush (non shop) car make a pass.

Iā€™ve only seen Brentā€™s passes, need to see independent verification.
Matter of fact yours is the only public kit Iā€™ve seen yet.
 

9secondko

Banned
Banned
Banned
Joined
Jul 4, 2014
Threads
3
Messages
3,156
Reaction score
911
Location
Irvine, ca
Vehicle(s)
2003 cobra
Whipple does make the most power, but in their equivalent trims with warranties they are even

this comparison was the CARB Roush vs the non-CARB whipple with exhaust mods. So not apples to apples

The higher power whipple ones do not come with the warranty

To me itā€™s a stretch to call whipple king. Itā€™s more of what suits your needs. If you have no budget or warranty concerns AND you want the most power, then yup, whipple wins. But then again Twin Turbo is even better if that is the case (once the tuning is unlocked)

but if you want a warranty, CARB, and whine and donā€™t care about every single pony then Roush is the choice IMO

the video creator noted the GTD uses a TVS blower over the twin screw. So there are diff applications for each type. Buyer preference is all that matters essentially
to find a point of agreement, yes, twin turbo is best. No two ways about it. Iā€™ve been advocating for FORD to TT the v8 for a while now.
 

kagemusha2662

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
312
Reaction score
353
Location
Idk
Vehicle(s)
'24 Mustang Dark Horse / '13 Camaro ZL1 / '25 Civic Hybrid
to find a point of agreement, yes, twin turbo is best. No two ways about it. Iā€™ve been advocating for FORD to TT the v8 for a while now.
they can't because twin turbos on a production car can never maintain the reliability that supercharged cars have. also the cost of building up an engine to hold the power of a twin turbo would push the price of the car up to insane costs. so problem is mostly around cost. If they were to go all out on a mustang with a twin turbo application, id venture to guess the cost of the car would be in the 150k+ range price. Not as simple as just slapping it on like most people do with their cars in the aftermarket.
 

robvas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2024
Threads
7
Messages
1,143
Reaction score
911
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
2011 Mustang
they can't because twin turbos on a production car can never maintain the reliability that supercharged cars have. also the cost of building up an engine to hold the power of a twin turbo would push the price of the car up to insane costs. so problem is mostly around cost. If they were to go all out on a mustang with a twin turbo application, id venture to guess the cost of the car would be in the 150k+ range price. Not as simple as just slapping it on like most people do with their cars in the aftermarket.
But the F150...

nevermind
 

kagemusha2662

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
312
Reaction score
353
Location
Idk
Vehicle(s)
'24 Mustang Dark Horse / '13 Camaro ZL1 / '25 Civic Hybrid
But the F150...

nevermind
Putting on an already existing turbo ecoboost makes more sense. I was speaking about the v8 coyote application. Putting turbo on an NA engine will lead to more problems compared to the ecoboost which is more built for a larger turbo

edit: also keep in mind the production twin turbo v6 on the f150 makes 325 hp. The tune of a production twin turbo is incredibly conservative/tight. putting the twin turbo on a mustang, which is a performance application, to push out high amounts of power with higher boost is asking for trouble
 

robvas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2024
Threads
7
Messages
1,143
Reaction score
911
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
2011 Mustang
Iā€™ve still year to see 1 single roush (non shop) car make a pass.

Iā€™ve only seen Brentā€™s passes, need to see independent verification.
Matter of fact yours is the only public kit Iā€™ve seen yet.
Do none of the VMP/Edelbrock 2650's out there count? Sure they are on S550's but same blower, same car....

See quite a few Roush install/dyno videos on YouTube but not many people taking them to the track just like the Whipple. I get that it's still hot in the south but it'll be 'boost weather' down there soon and it's cool enough up here to get great times.
 

robvas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2024
Threads
7
Messages
1,143
Reaction score
911
Location
MI
Vehicle(s)
2011 Mustang
Putting on an already existing turbo ecoboost makes more sense. I was speaking about the v8 coyote application. Putting turbo on an NA engine will lead to more problems compared to the ecoboost which is more built for a larger turbo
I wonder if the underhood packaging limitations on the Mustang keep ford from putting something like the 3.5 Eco in the Mustang. They should have no problem making to ~ 450-500hp, they are what, 400 in the F150 and 650 in the Ford GT?

3.5 eco crate engine is like 1/3 to 1/4 the price of a GT500 engine
 

Q6543

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2022
Threads
21
Messages
1,534
Reaction score
1,891
Location
Detroit
Vehicle(s)
1993 fox
Do none of the VMP/Edelbrock 2650's out there count? Sure they are on S550's but same blower, same car....
No, most are aftermarket tuned with fuel systems and better shift points.

I am curious to see the 2024 with the roush tunes performance on customer cars in the real world.

if tuning werenā€™t an issue, it wouldnā€™t matter
Sponsored

 
 








Top